Quick Menu

Upcoming Journals
  • No Upcoming Journals

Journal of Complementary and Alternative Medical Research

Journal of Complementary and Alternative Medical Research, ISSN: 2456-6276,Vol.: 3, Issue.: 1

 

Original-research-article

 

Medical Students’ Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards Traditional and Complementary Medicine, Tanta City, Gharbiyah Governorate, Egypt

 

 

Ahmed Tawfik El-Olemy1,2, Nashwa Mohammed Radwan1, Walid Mostafa Dawoud1, Hanaa A. Zayed1, Ehab Abo Ali1, Hala Elsabbagh1, Dalal Salem Al-Dossari3, Sara Osama Salem4 and Naseem Akhtar Qureshi2*

1Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tanta Medical School, University of Tanta, Tanta City, Egypt.

2National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

3Medication Safety Unit, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

4Poisoning and Information Center, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

 

General Comment

1. Up to 6th August, 2012, all SDI journals followed strict double blind review policy to ensure neutral evaluation. During this review process identity of both the authors and reviewers are kept hidden to ensure unbiased evaluation. More information is available in this link.

 

2. We have migrated to transparent and toughest ‘Advanced OPEN peer review’ system (Detailed general information is available in this link). Identity of the authors and reviewers will be revealed to each other during this review process. This transparent process will help to eradicate any possible malicious/purposeful interference by any person (publishing staff, reviewer, editor, author, etc) during peer review. As a result of this unique system all reviewers will get their due recognition and respect, once their names are published with the papers (Example Link). If reviewers do not want to reveal their identities, we will honour that request. In that case only the review reports will be published as ‘anonymous reviewer report’.

 

3. Additionally ‘Advanced OPEN peer review’ greatly helps in ‘continuity and advancement of science’. We strongly believe that all the files related to peer review of a manuscript are valuable and hold an important place in the continuity and advancement of science. If publishers publish the peer review reports along with published papers, this process can result in savings of thousands of hours of future authors during experiments, manuscript preparation, etc. by minimizing the common errors after reading these previously published peer review reports. Therefore, as per our new official policy update, if the manuscript is published, all peer review reports will be available to the readers. All files (like original manuscript, comments of the reviewers, revised manuscript, and editorial comment (if any)) related to the peer review, will be available in “Review history” link along with the published paper (Example Link).

 

4. Additionally we believe that one of the main objectives of peer review system is ‘to improve the quality of a candidate manuscript’. Normally we try to publish the ‘average marks (out of 10)’ a manuscript received at initial peer review stage and at final publication stage to record its history of improvement during peer review. This process further increases the transparency. It is more important to record honestly the ‘strength and weakness of a manuscript’ than claiming that 'our peer review system is perfect’. Therefore, these transparent processes (i.e. publication of review history files and scores of a particular manuscript) additionally give a clear idea of the strength and weakness of a published paper to the readers, which enhances the chances of proper use of the result of a research (and or reduces the chances of misuse of the weakness of the findings of the paper). Thus this transparent process may prove to be highly beneficial for the society in long run.

 

 

Specific Comment

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer review history

 

Stage Description File 1 File 2 Date
Stage 1 Original Manuscript File 1 NA Apr 17, 2017
Stage 2 Peer review report_1 (Ashraf Ramadan hafez, Egypt) File 1 NA Apr 20, 2017
Stage 2 Peer review report_2 (Jonatas Rafael de Oliveira, Brazil) File 1 NA May 01, 2017
Stage 2 Peer review report_3 (Lourens JC Erasmus, South Africa) File 1 NA May 02, 2017
Stage 2 Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 File 1 File 2 May 04, 2017
Stage 2 Re-Review report_1_v1 (Ashraf Ramadan hafez, Egypt) (NA) NA NA NA
Stage 2 Re-Review report_2_v1 (Jonatas Rafael de Oliveira, Brazil) File 1 NA May 06, 2017
Stage 2 Re-Review report_3_v1 (Lourens JC Erasmus, South Africa) File 1 NA May 08, 2017
Stage 3 Comment_Editor_1_v1 File 1 NA May 10, 2017

Search this site

Advanced Search

Announcement & News

ISI Thomson Reuters selected British Journal of Pharmaceutical Research for Emerging Sources Citation Index

We are delighted to inform that ISI Thomson Reuters selected British Journal of Pharmaceutical Resea...

SCOPUS selected Annual Research & Review in Biology (ARRB)

We are delighted to inform that famous indexing organization SCOPUS (from Elsevier) selected  A...

Index Copernicus Evaluation Result Released

We are delighted to inform that Index Copernicus (a leading indexing organization from Pol...

Journal Repository (JR): Permanent Digital Archiving of SDI journals

SDI is happy to announce that all our journals are now permanently archived in Journal Repository (J...

Index Copernicus Value of British Journal of Medicine and Medical Research

  We are delighted to inform that Index Copernicus (a leading indexing organization ...

SDI journal got 35th ranking in Publons

We are delighted to announce (as of 04/01/2016) that British Journal of Medicine and Medical Re...

Growth of SDI and world publication market

As of 2014, total 25,064 journals are competing in World market of journal publication. In 2011, tot...

Publication and site statistics (up to Sept, 2015)

  Number of submission: 22181 (Total up to Sept, 2015) Number of published paper: 10949&n...

Index Medicus selected 15 SDI journals

We are delighted to inform that Index Medicus (IMSEAR) has selected following 15 SDI journals for in...

SCIENCEDOMAIN international received 5844 submissions in 2013

SCIENCEDOMAIN international is pleased to announce that it has received 5844 submissions in 2013, ac...



SCIENCEDOMAIN Awards

  • No Awards listed.

Browser Compatibility : Mozila firefox, Google Crome and IE 7 & above. Creative Commons License Terms & Condition   |   Privacy Policy   |   Join Us   |   Help   |   Contact Us
© Copyright 2010-2017, SCIENCEDOMAIN international. All rights reserved.