Quick Menu

Upcoming Journals
  • No Upcoming Journals

Advances in Research

Advances in Research, ISSN: 2348-0394,Vol.: 8, Issue.: 3


Original Research Article


Low Bit Rate Speech Coding Using Differential Pulse Code Modulation



Shahnawaz Uddin1, Iffat Rehman Ansari1 and Sameena Naaz2*

1University Women’s Polytechnic, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.

2Department of CSE, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Jamia Hamdard University, New Delhi, India.


General Comment

1. Up to 6th August, 2012, all SDI journals followed strict double blind review policy to ensure neutral evaluation. During this review process identity of both the authors and reviewers are kept hidden to ensure unbiased evaluation. More information is available in this link.


2. We have migrated to transparent and toughest ‘Advanced OPEN peer review’ system (Detailed general information is available in this link). Identity of the authors and reviewers will be revealed to each other during this review process. This transparent process will help to eradicate any possible malicious/purposeful interference by any person (publishing staff, reviewer, editor, author, etc) during peer review. As a result of this unique system all reviewers will get their due recognition and respect, once their names are published with the papers (Example Link). If reviewers do not want to reveal their identities, we will honour that request. In that case only the review reports will be published as ‘anonymous reviewer report’.


3. Additionally ‘Advanced OPEN peer review’ greatly helps in ‘continuity and advancement of science’. We strongly believe that all the files related to peer review of a manuscript are valuable and hold an important place in the continuity and advancement of science. If publishers publish the peer review reports along with published papers, this process can result in savings of thousands of hours of future authors during experiments, manuscript preparation, etc. by minimizing the common errors after reading these previously published peer review reports. Therefore, as per our new official policy update, if the manuscript is published, all peer review reports will be available to the readers. All files (like original manuscript, comments of the reviewers, revised manuscript, and editorial comment (if any)) related to the peer review, will be available in “Review history” link along with the published paper (Example Link).


4. Additionally we believe that one of the main objectives of peer review system is ‘to improve the quality of a candidate manuscript’. Normally we try to publish the ‘average marks (out of 10)’ a manuscript received at initial peer review stage and at final publication stage to record its history of improvement during peer review. This process further increases the transparency. It is more important to record honestly the ‘strength and weakness of a manuscript’ than claiming that 'our peer review system is perfect’. Therefore, these transparent processes (i.e. publication of review history files and scores of a particular manuscript) additionally give a clear idea of the strength and weakness of a published paper to the readers, which enhances the chances of proper use of the result of a research (and or reduces the chances of misuse of the weakness of the findings of the paper). Thus this transparent process may prove to be highly beneficial for the society in long run.



Specific Comment

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 5.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8/10

Peer review history


Stage Description File 1 File 2 Date
Stage 1 Original Manuscript File 1 NA Oct 26, 2016
Stage 2 Peer review report_1(Anonymous, USA) File 1 NA Nov 15, 2016
Stage 2 Peer review report_2(Anusha Yellamsetty, USA) File 1 NA Nov 18, 2016
Stage 2 Peer review report_3(Zhongpeng Wang, China) File 1 NA Nov 06, 2016
Stage 2 Peer review report_4(Zhao Jian, Singapore) File 1 NA Nov 05, 2016
Stage 2 Revised MS v1 and Feedback v1 File 1 File 2 Nov 27, 2016
Stage 2 Re-Review report_1_v1(Anonymous, USA) File 1 NA Nov 29, 2016
Stage 2 Re-Review report_2_v1(Anusha Yellamsetty, USA) (No res) NA NA NA
Stage 2 Re-Review report_3_v1(Zhongpeng Wang, China) File 1 NA Dec 03, 2016
Stage 2 Re-Review report_4_v1(Zhao Jian, Singapore) File 1 NA Dec 01, 2016
Stage 2 Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 File 1 File 2 Dec 06, 2016
Stage 2 Re-Review report_1_v2(Anonymous, USA) File 1 NA Dec 09, 2016
Stage 2 Re-Review report_2_v2(Anusha Yellamsetty, USA) File 1 NA Dec 17, 0201
Stage 2 Re-Review report_3_v2(Zhongpeng Wang, China) File 1 NA Dec 15, 2016
Stage 2 Re-Review report_4_v2(Zhao Jian, Singapore) (NA) NA NA NA
Stage 2 Revised MS v3 and Feedback v3 File 1 File 2 Dec 16, 2016
Stage 3 Comment_Editor_1_v1 File 1 NA Dec 23, 2016
Stage 3 Comment_Editor_2_v1 File 1 NA Jan 03, 2017
Stage 3 Revised MS v4 and Feedback v4 File 1 File 2 Jan 04, 2017
Stage 3 Comment_Editor_1_v2 File 1 NA Jan 05, 2017

Search this site

Advanced Search

Announcement & News

SCOPUS selected Annual Research & Review in Biology (ARRB)

We are delighted to inform that famous indexing organization SCOPUS (from Elsevier) selected  A...

Index Copernicus Evaluation Result Released

We are delighted to inform that Index Copernicus (a leading indexing organization from Pol...

Journal Repository (JR): Permanent Digital Archiving of SDI journals

SDI is happy to announce that all our journals are now permanently archived in Journal Repository (J...

Index Copernicus Value of British Journal of Medicine and Medical Research

  We are delighted to inform that Index Copernicus (a leading indexing organization ...

SDI journal got 35th ranking in Publons

We are delighted to announce (as of 04/01/2016) that British Journal of Medicine and Medical Re...

Growth of SDI and world publication market

As of 2014, total 25,064 journals are competing in World market of journal publication. In 2011, tot...

Publication and site statistics (up to Sept, 2015)

  Number of submission: 22181 (Total up to Sept, 2015) Number of published paper: 10949&n...

Index Medicus selected 15 SDI journals

We are delighted to inform that Index Medicus (IMSEAR) has selected following 15 SDI journals for in...

SCIENCEDOMAIN international received 5844 submissions in 2013

SCIENCEDOMAIN international is pleased to announce that it has received 5844 submissions in 2013, ac...

Science (IF: 31) report confirmed the high standard of SDI journal

As per a recent report (Link) of Science journal (present Impact factor 31), one of our journal (Bri...


  • No Awards listed.

Browser Compatibility : Mozila firefox, Google Crome and IE 7 & above. Creative Commons License Terms & Condition   |   Privacy Policy   |   Join Us   |   Help   |   Contact Us
© Copyright 2010-2017, SCIENCEDOMAIN international. All rights reserved.