+91 8617752708

Physical Review & Research International, ISSN: 2231-1815,Vol.: 1, Issue.: 2 (April-June)

Research Paper

Comparison of ICP-OES and XRF Performance for Pb and As Analysis in Environmental Soil Samples from Chihuahua City, Mexico

Delgado R. Marcos1*, Parsons Jason2, Garcia Humberto3, Corral A. Alba Y.1, Cruz J. Gustavo4, Campos T. Alfredo5, Duarte M. Alberto5, Gardea-Torresdey Jorge2

1Universidad Autónoma de Cd. Juárez, Instituo de Ciencias Biomédicas. Estocolmo y Anillo Envolvente del Pronaf 32310, Cd. Juárez, México;
2The University of Texas at El Paso, Chemistry Department and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Ph.D. Program. El Paso, Tx. U.S.A.;
3Instituto Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey Campus Cd. Juárez. Ave. Tomás Fernández Campos No. 8945, Parque Industrial A.J. Bermúdez, C.P. 32470, Cd. Juárez, Chih. México;
4Universidad de Guanajuato, Noria Alta s/n, Guanajuato, Gto., México;
5Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados. Miguel de Cervantes 120, Complejo Industrial Chihuahua 31109, Chihuahua, Chih., México.
 

Abstracts

Lead (Pb) and arsenic (As) levels on PM10 were measured for indoor and outdoor atmospheres and soil samples in Chihuahua City (Chihuahua, Mexico). The concentration of both Pb and As in the soil samples was determined and compared using two instrumental techniques, Inductively coupled-plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) and X-ray fluorescence (XRF). Statistical analyses were performed to determine if significant differences existed between the instrumental techniques, which included F-test for variances evaluation and t-test for mean comparison. The statistical analysis demonstrated that no statistically significant differences were observed for the As concentrations; however, for the Pb concentrations, significant differences did exist between the instrumental techniques. In addition, two microwave assisted digestion techniques were also tested to determine if the difference in the Pb concentrations were due to the extraction technique rather than instrumental method. The first digestion technique used nitric acid (HNO3), which commonly is used for the extraction of soluble materials within a sample. The second digestion technique used a 1:4 mixture (1 part of concentrated HNO3: 4 parts of concentrated HCl) which generally extracts more refractory elements but destroys more of the sample matrix than HNO3. Similar statistical tests (F-test and t-test) were applied to the data from both digestion types, which showed no significant difference between the extraction techniques.

Keywords : ICP-OES; Pb; XRF; soil;

Full Article - PDF    Page 29-44 Article Metrics

Review History    Comments

About Us

SCIENCEDOMAIN international (SDI) publishes high-quality, OPEN peer-reviewed, OPEN access international journals in various sectors of science, technology and

Our Contacts

Guest House Road, Street no - 1/6,
Hooghly, West Bengal,
India

+91 8617752708

 

Third Floor, 207 Regent Street
London, W1B 3HH,
UK

+44 20-3031-1429