Advertisement
Quick Menu

Upcoming Journals

Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research

Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, ISSN: 2456-8899, ISSN: 2231-0614 (Past),Vol.: 23, Issue.: 3

Original-research-article

Comparison of Various Phenotypic Methods for the Detection of Metallo-beta-lactamases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

 

Sulmaz Reshi1*, Nargis Bali1, Munazah Manzoor1, Suhail Farooq2 and Dalip K. Kakru1

1Department of Microbiology, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India.

2Department of Surgery, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India.

 

Article Information

Editor(s):

(1) Crispim Cerutti Junior, Department of Social Medicine, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Brazil.

(2) Evangelos Marinos, University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laboratory of Biology, Athens, Greece.

(3) Salomone Di Saverio, Emergency Surgery Unit, Department of General and Transplant Surgery, S. Orsola Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Carlos Henrique Camargo, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Brazil.

(2) Noha Tharwat Abou El-khier, Mansoura University, Egypt.

(3) C. I. Chikwendu, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

Complete Peer review History: http://www.sciencedomain.org/review-history/20417

 

Abstracts

 

Aims: To evaluate the screening antibiotic and phenotypic test that can be used to confirm metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) production in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and to find out the prevalent MBL gene in them.

Materials and Methods: Three hundred and six isolates of P. aeruginosa were screened for resistance to meropenem (MEM), ceftazidime (CAZ) and imipenem (IMP). Isolates resistant to any of these were taken as screen test positive for MBL production and subjected to double disc synergy test (DDST) and combined disc synergy test (CDST), using MEM, CAZ and IMP with and without EDTA. Broth microdilution with MEM and IMP with and without EDTA was done to confirm MBL production (four fold reduction in minimum inhibitory concentration, MIC). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for blaVIM and blaIMP was done to find the prevalent gene in P. aeruginosa isolates.

Results: MEM picked up the highest number of MBL positive isolates 28.8% (n=76). CDST using MEM confirmed all the 76 screen test positive isolates to be MBL producers. Sensitivity of CDST using MEM, CAZ and IMP was 100%, 92.7% and 88.4% respectively. MIC by microbroth dilution for MEM and IMP was done for 76 MEM and 70 IMP positive isolates. For MEM maximum number of isolates had an MIC of 16 µg/ml and for IMP maximum number of isolates had an MIC of 32 µg/ml. blaVIM was the predominant MBL gene in P. aeruginosa isolates.

Conclusion: Meropenem was found to be a better screening as well as confirmatory agent for MBL detection. blaVIM was the predominant MBL gene in P. aeruginosa in our hospital.

 

Keywords :

Combined disc synergy test; double disc synergy test; Metallo-beta-lactamase; polymerase chain reaction.

 

Full Article - PDF    Page 1-8    Article Metrics

 

DOI : 10.9734/JAMMR/2017/28865

Review History    Comments

Search this site

Advanced Search

Announcement & News

ISI Thomson Reuters selected British Journal of Pharmaceutical Research for Emerging Sources Citation Index

We are delighted to inform that ISI Thomson Reuters selected British Journal of Pharmaceutical Resea...

SCOPUS selected Annual Research & Review in Biology (ARRB)

We are delighted to inform that famous indexing organization SCOPUS (from Elsevier) selected  A...

Index Copernicus Evaluation Result Released

We are delighted to inform that Index Copernicus (a leading indexing organization from Pol...

Journal Repository (JR): Permanent Digital Archiving of SDI journals

SDI is happy to announce that all our journals are now permanently archived in Journal Repository (J...

SDI journal got 35th ranking in Publons

We are delighted to announce (as of 04/01/2016) that British Journal of Medicine and Medical Re...

Growth of SDI and world publication market

As of 2014, total 25,064 journals are competing in World market of journal publication. In 2011, tot...

Science (IF: 31) report confirmed the high standard of SDI journal

As per a recent report (Link) of Science journal (present Impact factor 31), one of our journal (Bri...

SDI introduced Post-publication peer review by its comment section

SDI journals encourage Post-publication peer review by its comment section   Policy details a...

SDI promotes transparent Advanced OPEN peer review

We have migrated to transparent and toughest ‘Advanced OPEN peer review’ system (...



SCIENCEDOMAIN Awards

  • No Awards listed.

Browser Compatibility : Mozila firefox, Google Crome and IE 7 & above. Creative Commons License Terms & Condition   |   Privacy Policy   |   Join Us   |   Help   |   Contact Us
© Copyright 2010-2018, SCIENCEDOMAIN international. All rights reserved.