Advertisement
Quick Menu

Upcoming Journals

British Journal of Medicine and Medical Research

British Journal of Medicine and Medical Research, ISSN: 2231-0614,Vol.: 14, Issue.: 12

Short Research Article

A Survey Showing the Need to Incorporate the Teaching of Critical Appraisal Skills in the Undergraduate Medical Curriculum

 

Shameen Jaunoo1* and Hannah L. Adams2

1Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.

2Warwickshire Surgical Research Group, Warwickshire, UK.

 

Article Information
Editor(s):
(1) Syed Faisal Zaidi, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University-HS,National Guard Health Affairs, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Reviewers:
(1) Anna Maria Paganoni, Politecnico di Milano, Italy.
(2) Wagih Mommtaz Ghannam, Mansoura University, Egypt.
(3) Elvira Bormusov, Technion Inst. of Technology, Israel.
Complete Peer review History: http://sciencedomain.org/review-history/14049

 

Abstracts

 

Aim: Evidence based medicine (EBM) not only increases knowledge but forms the foundations upon which decision making processes are used in medicine. This requires well-conducted research and the ability for doctors to critically appraise literature. The aim of this survey was to gain an insight into the understanding of critical appraisal amongst medical student and trainees, with particular emphasis on the teaching aspect of these skills in the undergraduate curriculum.

Methods: Online questionnaires were distributed within the West Midlands Deanery to final year medical students (from the three medical schools) foundation doctors, core surgical trainees and specialist registrars. The questions asked related to levels of confidence in critical appraisal of scientific papers, undergraduate exposure to the process of critical review and opinions on whether these skills should form a more significant component of the undergraduate curriculum. 

Results: 266 questionnaire responses were received from a range of grades. 127 final year medical students, 62 foundation doctors, 34 core trainees and 43 registrars. Respondents were asked to grade their confidence in critically appraising scientific papers from a choice of no confidence, little confidence, quite confident and very confident. There was a noticeable correlation between level of confidence and grade of respondent. 93% felt critical appraisal teaching was inadequate, with particular emphasis on research methods and paper analysis, with 96% of respondents suggesting this should form a mandatory part of the curriculum.

Conclusion: This survey clearly demonstrates the need to ensure that critical appraisal skills are incorporated into the undergraduate curriculum so that newly qualified doctors begin their careers equipped with the essential skills required to practice evidence-based medicine.

 

Keywords :

Evidence based medicine; critical appraisal; training; medical curriculum.

 

Full Article - PDF    Page 1-8    Article Metrics

 

DOI : 10.9734/BJMMR/2016/24238

Review History    Comments

Search this site

Advanced Search

Announcement & News

Nature (Impact Factor: 41.6) confirmed high standard of SDI journal and its editors

We are happy to inform that Nature (Impact Factor: 41.6) confirmed high standard of SDI journal and ...

ISI Thomson Reuters selected British Journal of Pharmaceutical Research for Emerging Sources Citation Index

We are delighted to inform that ISI Thomson Reuters selected British Journal of Pharmaceutical Resea...

SCOPUS selected Annual Research & Review in Biology (ARRB)

We are delighted to inform that famous indexing organization SCOPUS (from Elsevier) selected  A...

Index Copernicus Evaluation Result Released

We are delighted to inform that Index Copernicus (a leading indexing organization from Pol...

Journal Repository (JR): Permanent Digital Archiving of SDI journals

SDI is happy to announce that all our journals are now permanently archived in Journal Repository (J...

SDI journal got 35th ranking in Publons

We are delighted to announce (as of 04/01/2016) that British Journal of Medicine and Medical Re...

Growth of SDI and world publication market

As of 2014, total 25,064 journals are competing in World market of journal publication. In 2011, tot...

Science (IF: 31) report confirmed the high standard of SDI journal

As per a recent report (Link) of Science journal (present Impact factor 31), one of our journal (Bri...

SDI introduced Post-publication peer review by its comment section

SDI journals encourage Post-publication peer review by its comment section   Policy details a...

SDI promotes transparent Advanced OPEN peer review

We have migrated to transparent and toughest ‘Advanced OPEN peer review’ system (...



SCIENCEDOMAIN Awards

  • No Awards listed.

Browser Compatibility : Mozila firefox, Google Crome and IE 7 & above. Creative Commons License Terms & Condition   |   Privacy Policy   |   Join Us   |   Help   |   Contact Us
© Copyright 2010-2018, SCIENCEDOMAIN international. All rights reserved.